<Home — Psychoactive Plant Database



  Psychoactive Plant Database - Neuroactive Phytochemical Collection





Worldwide, there are plants known as psychoactive plants that naturally contain psychedelic active components. They have a high concentration of neuroprotective substances that can interact with the nervous system to produce psychedelic effects. Despite these plants' hazardous potential, recreational use of them is on the rise because of their psychoactive properties. Early neuroscience studies relied heavily on psychoactive plants and plant natural products (NPs), and both recreational and hazardous NPs have contributed significantly to the understanding of almost all neurotransmitter systems. Worldwide, there are many plants that contain psychoactive properties, and people have been using them for ages. Psychoactive plant compounds may significantly alter how people perceive the world.

 

 

1. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2024 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s00702-024-02825-8. Online ahead of print. Dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: the show must go on. Jost WH(1). Author information: (1)Parkinson-Klinik Ortenau, Kreuzbergstr. 12-16, 77723, Wolfach, Germany. w.jost@parkinson-klinik.de. Dopamine agonists (DA) have proven very successful in the treatment of Parkinson's disease for a good many years now. In the 1990's they experienced a high level of acceptance particularly in the European countries because their efficacy was in fact established, their tolerability was improved on and, in addition, several preparations were available with longer effect durations. But the discovery of cardiac fibroses led to a substantial setback and even rejection of therapy using ergoline DA. In recent years, impulse control disturbances have been observed increasingly with the result that higher doses have been reduced and the previously popular use of non-ergoline DA was discontinued. In addition, newer data on levodopa were published which clearly relativized the occurrence of late complications under levodopa and led to a differentiated use. Thus the importance of their use has waned over the years. But we should rather avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. DA serve us well and reliably so. The pendulum apparently thrives of the extremes but in the case of DA we should keep from falling back into the other extreme: We can and in fact must further make use of the DA, but with a clear view of specific goals and in a differentiated way. DA constitute the second-most important substance class after levodopa. Their optimized application can only be recommended for the good of our patients. © 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-024-02825-8 PMID: 39261330 2. J Neurol. 2024 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12632-6. Online ahead of print. Pharmacotherapy of motor symptoms in early and mid-stage Parkinson's disease: guideline "Parkinson's disease" of the German Society of Neurology. Höllerhage M(1), Becktepe J(2), Classen J(3), Deuschl G(2), Ebersbach G(4), Hopfner F(5), Lingor P(6)(7)(8), Löhle M(9)(10), Maaß S(8), Pötter-Nerger M(11), Odin P(12)(13), Woitalla D(14); German Parkinson’s Guidelines Group; Trenkwalder C(15)(16), Höglinger GU(17)(18)(19). Collaborators: Bähr M, Berg D, Brockmann K, Buhmann C, Ceballos-Baumann A, Claßen J, Deuschl C, Dodel R, Eggers C, van Eimeren T, Fanciulli A, Fimm B, Folkerts AK, Gausepohl M, Hasan A, Hermann W, Hilker-Roggendorf R, Höglinger G, Jost W, Kalbe E, Kassubek J, Klebe S, Klein C, Klietz M, Köglsperger T, Kühn A, Krack P, Krismer F, Kuhlenbäumer G, Levin J, Liepelt-Scarfone I, Loewenbrück K, Lorenzl S, Maetzler W, Menzel R, Meyer PT, Mollenhauer B, Neumann M, Outeiro T, Reese R, Reetz K, Rieß O, Ruf V, Schneider A, Schrader C, Schnitzler A, Seppi K, Sixel-Döring F, Storch A, Tönges L, van Eimeren T, Walter U, Wächter T, Warnecke T, Wegner F, Winkler C, Witt K, Zeuner K. Author information: (1)Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. (2)Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany. (3)Department of Neurology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany. (4)Movement Disorders Hospital, Beelitz-Heilstätten, Germany. (5)Department of Neurology with Friedrich Baur Institute, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. (6)School of Medicine and Health, Department of Neurology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. (7)Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany. (8)German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany. (9)Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, 18051, Rostock, Germany. (10)Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany. (11)Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. (12)Division of Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. (13)Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. (14)Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Katholische Kliniken Ruhrhalbinsel, Contilia Gruppe, Essen, Germany. (15)Paracelsus-Elena-Klinik, Kassel, Germany. (16)Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany. (17)Department of Neurology with Friedrich Baur Institute, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Guenter.Hoeglinger@med.uni-muenchen.de. (18)Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany. Guenter.Hoeglinger@med.uni-muenchen.de. (19)German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany. Guenter.Hoeglinger@med.uni-muenchen.de. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are multiple pharmacological treatment options for motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). These comprise multiple drug classes which are approved for the condition, including levodopa, dopamine agonists, COMT inhibitors, MAO-B inhibitors, NMDA-receptor antagonists, anticholinergics, and others. Some of the drugs are approved for monotherapy and combination therapy while others are only approved as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Furthermore, treatment for special treatment situations, e.g., rescue medication for off-phases, for tremor, treatment during pregnancy and breast feeding is discussed and recommendations are given with further details. METHODS: The recommendations were based on systematic literature reviews, drafted by expert teams, consented in online polls followed by online consensus meetings of the whole German Parkinson's Guideline Group, and publicly released in November 2023. RESULTS: In the new S2k (i.e., consensus-based) guidelines, the pharmacotherapy of the motor symptoms of PD is discussed in five chapters. These comprise "Parkinson medication", "Initial monotherapy", "Early combination therapy", "Fluctuations and dyskinesia", and "Parkinsonian tremor". Furthermore, there is a chapter for special treatment situations, including perioperative management, freezing of gait, and pregnancy and breastfeeding. CONCLUSION: The recommendations for the pharmacotherapy of motor symptoms of PD have been updated. Newly available drugs have been added, while other drugs (e.g., ergoline dopamine agonists, anticholinergics, budipine) have been removed from the recommendations. © 2024. The Author(s). DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12632-6 PMID: 39207521 3. Neuron. 2024 Oct 9;112(19):3295-3310.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Aug 1. Structural basis of psychedelic LSD recognition at dopamine D(1) receptor. Fan L(1), Zhuang Y(2), Wu H(3), Li H(4), Xu Y(2), Wang Y(2), He L(3), Wang S(5), Chen Z(3), Cheng J(4), Xu HE(6), Wang S(7). Author information: (1)Key Laboratory of Systems Health Science of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China. Electronic address: fanluyu2018@sibcb.ac.cn. (2)State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Center for Structure and Function of Drug Targets, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China. (3)Key Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China. (4)iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China; School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China. (5)Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province, School of Anesthesiology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang 261021, China. (6)State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Center for Structure and Function of Drug Targets, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Lingang Laboratory, Shanghai 200031, China. Electronic address: eric.xu@simm.ac.cn. (7)Key Laboratory of Systems Health Science of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China; Key Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China. Electronic address: wangsheng@sibcb.ac.cn. Understanding the kinetics of LSD in receptors and subsequent induced signaling is crucial for comprehending both the psychoactive and therapeutic effects of LSD. Despite extensive research on LSD's interactions with serotonin 2A and 2B receptors, its behavior on other targets, including dopamine receptors, has remained elusive. Here, we present cryo-EM structures of LSD/PF6142-bound dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1)-legobody complexes, accompanied by a β-arrestin-mimicking nanobody, NBA3, shedding light on the determinants of G protein coupling versus β-arrestin coupling. Structural analysis unveils a distinctive binding mode of LSD in DRD1, particularly with the ergoline moiety oriented toward TM4. Kinetic investigations uncover an exceptionally rapid dissociation rate of LSD in DRD1, attributed to the flexibility of extracellular loop 2 (ECL2). Moreover, G protein can stabilize ECL2 conformation, leading to a significant slowdown in ligand's dissociation rate. These findings establish a solid foundation for further exploration of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) dynamics and their relevance to signal transduction. Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.07.003 PMID: 39094559 [Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests. 4. Drug Test Anal. 2024 Jul 4. doi: 10.1002/dta.3767. Online ahead of print. Analytical and behavioral characterization of 1-hexanoyl-LSD (1H-LSD). Brandt SD(1), Kavanagh PV(2), Gare S(3), Stratford A(4), Halberstadt AL(5)(6)(7). Author information: (1)School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. (2)Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. (3)Department of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. (4)Synex Synthetics BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands. (5)Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Southern California, USA. (6)Center for Psychedelic Research, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Southern California, USA. (7)Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, Southern California, USA. The development of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) derivatives and analogs continues to inform the design of novel receptor probes and potentially new medicines. On the other hand, a number of newly developed LSD derivatives have also emerged as recreational drugs, leading to reports of their detection in some countries. One position in the ergoline scaffold of LSD that is frequently targeted is the N1-position; numerous N1-alkylcarbonyl LSD derivatives have been reported where the acyl chain is attached to the indole nitrogen, for example, in the form of linear n-alkane substituents, which represent higher homologs of the prototypical 1-acetyl-N,N-diethyllysergamide (1A-LSD, ALD-52). In this study, 1-hexanoyl-LSD (1H-LSD, SYN-L-027), a novel N1-acyl LSD derivative, was characterized analytically using standard techniques, followed by evaluation of its in vivo behavioral effects using the mouse head-twitch response (HTR) assay in C57BL/6J mice. 1H-LSD induced the HTR, with a median effective dose (ED50) of 192.4 μg/kg (equivalent to 387 nmol/kg), making it roughly equipotent to ALD-52 when tested previously under similar conditions. Similar to other N1-acylated analogs, 1H-LSD is anticipated to by hydrolyzed to LSD in vivo and acts as a prodrug. It is currently unknown whether 1H-LSD has appeared as on the research chemical market or is being used recreationally. © 2024 The Author(s). Drug Testing and Analysis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/dta.3767 PMID: 38965834 5. Cabergoline. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®) [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 2006–. 2024 May 15. Cabergoline is usually not used during breastfeeding because it suppresses lactation. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration considers cabergoline to be not indicated to suppress lactation because the similar drug bromocriptine has caused hypertension, stroke, seizures and psychosis when used for this purpose. However, two systematic reviews found that cabergoline was generally well tolerated for use in suppressing lactation, but dizziness, headache, nausea and vomiting occur occasionally.[1-3] A retrospective study of 225 women who received cabergoline postpartum had a maximum decrease in systolic blood pressure of 10.88 mm Hg at 20 to 24 hours after the dose.[4] Serious reactions are uncommon, but include thromboembolic and neurologic events. Psychiatric symptoms have occurred rarely. Some experts recommend cabergoline as a safer alternative to bromocriptine for lactation suppression, but others do not.[5-9] The disadvantage of cabergoline is that it has a half-life of about 68 hours, which means that any adverse effects might persist for a prolonged period of time. Women treated with cabergoline for pituitary adenomas who become pregnant can breastfed their infants with no apparent risk of recurrence. A treatment scheme has been reported for mothers with hypergalactia that uses low doses of cabergoline to decrease milk supply.[10] Decreased milk synthesis may occur by 2 days after drug administration.[11] PMID: 30000386