<Home — Psychoactive Plant Database



  Psychoactive Plant Database - Neuroactive Phytochemical Collection





Worldwide, there are plants known as psychoactive plants that naturally contain psychedelic active components. They have a high concentration of neuroprotective substances that can interact with the nervous system to produce psychedelic effects. Despite these plants' hazardous potential, recreational use of them is on the rise because of their psychoactive properties. Early neuroscience studies relied heavily on psychoactive plants and plant natural products (NPs), and both recreational and hazardous NPs have contributed significantly to the understanding of almost all neurotransmitter systems. Worldwide, there are many plants that contain psychoactive properties, and people have been using them for ages. Psychoactive plant compounds may significantly alter how people perceive the world.

 

 

1. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 Oct;156 Suppl 1:112477. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112477. Epub 2021 Aug 5. RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, vanillyl ethyl ether, CAS Registry Number 13184-86-6. Api AM(1), Belsito D(2), Botelho D(1), Bruze M(3), Burton GA Jr(4), Buschmann J(5), Cancellieri MA(1), Dagli ML(6), Date M(1), Dekant W(7), Deodhar C(1), Fryer AD(8), Jones L(1), Joshi K(1), Kumar M(1), Lapczynski A(1), Lavelle M(1), Lee I(1), Liebler DC(9), Moustakas H(1), Na M(1), Penning TM(10), Ritacco G(1), Romine J(1), Sadekar N(1), Schultz TW(11), Selechnik D(1), Siddiqi F(1), Sipes IG(12), Sullivan G(13), Thakkar Y(1), Tokura Y(14). Author information: (1)Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, 07677, USA. (2)Member Expert Panel, Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, 161 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY, 10032, USA. (3)Member Expert Panel, Malmo University Hospital, Department of Occupational & Environmental Dermatology, Sodra Forstadsgatan 101, Entrance 47, Malmo, SE-20502, Sweden. (4)Member Expert Panel, School of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan, Dana Building G110, 440 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI, 58109, USA. (5)Member Expert Panel, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Nikolai-Fuchs-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. (6)Member Expert Panel, University of Sao Paulo, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Pathology, Av. Prof. dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Sao Paulo, CEP 05508-900, Brazil. (7)Member Expert Panel, University of Wuerzburg, Department of Toxicology, Versbacher Str. 9, 97078, Würzburg, Germany. (8)Member Expert Panel, Oregon Health Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA. (9)Member Expert Panel, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Center in Molecular Toxicology, 638 Robinson Research Building, 2200 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN, 37232-0146, USA. (10)Member of Expert Panel, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Center of Excellence in Environmental Toxicology, 1316 Biomedical Research Building (BRB) II/III, 421 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3083, USA. (11)Member Expert Panel, The University of Tennessee, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Comparative Medicine, 2407 River Dr., Knoxville, TN, 37996- 4500, USA. (12)Member Expert Panel, Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona, College of Medicine, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, P.O. Box 245050, Tucson, AZ, 85724-5050, USA. (13)Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, 07677, USA. Electronic address: gsullivan@rifm.org. (14)Member Expert Panel, The Journal of Dermatological Science (JDS), Editor-in-Chief, Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112477 PMID: 34364961 [Indexed for MEDLINE] 2. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2020 Sep;84(9):1870-1885. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2020.1771168. Epub 2020 May 29. Characterization of newly developed pepper cultivars (Capsicum chinense) 'Dieta0011-0301', 'Dieta0011-0602', 'Dieta0041-0401', and 'Dieta0041-0601' containing high capsinoid concentrations and a strong fruity aroma. Seki T(1), Ota M(1), Hirano H(1), Nakagawa K(2). Author information: (1)Research Institute for Bioscience Products & Fine Chemicals, Ajinomoto Co., Inc ., Kawasaki, Japan. (2)Division of Bioscience and Biotechnology for Future Bioindustries, Department of Applied Bioorganic Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University , Sendai, Japan. Capsaicinoids are responsible for the pungent flavor of peppers (Capsicum sp.). The cultivar CH-19 Sweet is a non-pungent pepper mutant that biosynthesizes the low-pungent capsaicinoid analogs, capsinoids. Capsinoids possess important pharmaceutical properties. However, capsinoid concentrations are very low in CH-19 Sweet, and Capsicum cultivars with high content capsinoids are desirable for industrial applications of capsinoids. Habanero, Bhut Jolokia, and Infinity are species of Capsicum chinense, and have strong pungency and intense fruity flavors. In the present study, we report new cultivars with high concentrations of capsinoids (more than ten-fold higher than in CH-19 Sweet), and showed that these cultivars (Dieta0011-0301 and Dieta0011-0602 from Bhut Jolokia, Dieta0041-0401 and Dieta0041-0601 from Infinity) are of nutritional and medicinal value and have fruity aromas. We also obtained a vanilla bean flavor, vanillyl alcohol, and vanillyl ethyl ether from capsinoids in the fruit of these cultivars following the addition of ethanol at room temperature. ABBREVIATIONS: p-AMT: putative aminotransferase; C. annuum: Capsicum annuum; C. chinense: Capsicum chinense; dCAPS: derived Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences. DOI: 10.1080/09168451.2020.1771168 PMID: 32471326 [Indexed for MEDLINE] 3. J Mass Spectrom. 2014 May;49(5):353-70. doi: 10.1002/jms.3347. Nontargeted GC-MS approach for volatile profile of toasting in cherry, chestnut, false acacia, and ash wood. Fernández de Simón B(1), Sanz M, Cadahía E, Esteruelas E, Muñoz AM. Author information: (1)Departamento de Productos Forestales, Centro de Investigación Forestal (CIFOR), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Apdo. 8111, 28080, Madrid, Spain. By using a nontargeted GC-MS approach, 153 individual volatile compounds were found in extracts from untoasted, light toasted and medium-toasted cherry, chestnut, false acacia, as well as European and American ash wood, used in cooperage for aging wines, spirits and other beverages. In all wood types, the toasting provoked a progressive increase in carbohydrate derivatives, lactones and lignin constituents, along with a variety of other components, thus increasing the quantitative differences among species with the toasting intensity. The qualitative differences in the volatile profiles allow for identifying woods from cherry (being p-anisylalcohol, p-anisylaldehyde, p-anisylacetone, methyl benzoate and benzyl salicylate detected only in this wood), chestnut (cis and trans whisky lactone) and false acacia (resorcinol, 3,4-dimethoxyphenol, 2,4-dihydroxy benzaldehyde, 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone, 2,4-dihydroxypropiophenone and 2,4-dihydroxy-3-methoxyacetophenone), but not those from ash, because of the fact that all compounds present in this wood are detected in at least one other. However, the quantitative differences can be clearly used to identify toasted ash wood, with tyrosol being most prominent, but 2-furanmethanol, 3- and 4-ethylcyclotene, α-methylcrotonolactone, solerone, catechol, 3-methylcatechol and 3-hydroxybenzaldehyde as well. Regarding oak wood, its qualitative volatile profile could be enough to distinguish it from cherry and acacia woods, and the quantitative differences from chestnut (vanillyl ethyl ether, isoacetovanillone, butirovanillone, 1-(5-methyl-2-furyl)-2-propanone and 4-hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-(2H)-pyran-2-one) and ash toasted woods. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/jms.3347 PMID: 24809897 [Indexed for MEDLINE] 4. J Agric Food Chem. 1998 Feb 16;46(2):657-663. doi: 10.1021/jf970559r. Formation and Degradation of Furfuryl Alcohol, 5-Methylfurfuryl Alcohol, Vanillyl Alcohol, and Their Ethyl Ethers in Barrel-Aged Wines. Spillman PJ(1), Pollnitz AP, Liacopoulos D, Pardon KH, Sefton MA. Author information: (1)Department of Horticulture, Viticulture and Oenology, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia, and The Australian Wine Research Institute, P.O. Box 197, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia. Furfural, 5-methylfurfural, and vanillin co-occurred in 64 barrel-aged red, white, and model wines with the reduction products, furfuryl alcohol, 5-methylfurfuryl alcohol, and vanillyl alcohol, and with the corresponding ethyl ethers of these alcohols. Hydrolytic studies in a model wine have shown that 5-methylfurfuryl ethyl ether is formed rapidly from 5-methylfurfuryl alcohol, but both decomposed quickly under the conditions. Vanillyl ethyl ether was also formed relatively rapidly, and both this ether and vanillyl alcohol were stable in the model wine. The formation of furfuryl ethyl ether from furfuryl alcohol and the subsequent decomposition of these two compounds were comparatively slow. The relative concentration of these aromatic alcohols and ethers in the barrel-aged wines was consistent with the observed stability of the furan derivatives, but low concentrations of vanillyl alcohol and vanillyl ethyl ether observed in all samples showed that factors other than solvolytic degradation were responsible for reducing the concentration of these compounds in wine. Furfuryl ethyl ether, which had an aroma threshold of 430 µg/L in a white wine, was found at approximate concentrations of up to 230 µg/L in the wines. DOI: 10.1021/jf970559r PMID: 10554294